The changes mandated by Dodd-Frank will significantly change many markets. Implementation will impose price controls, require significant increased in staffing, and restrict compensation programs, to name a few. However, how far can U.S. regulators deviate from established international regulatory reforms? Can the U.S. really ignore EU regulatory risk frameworks without setting the stage for additional problems in the future? My bet is we have much less latitude than we all think.
Dodd with my Frank
Dodd-Frank...The enabling act was a mere 2,300 hundred pages. Let's see how long the actual regulations extend. Our goal is to help people stay on top the law as it changes.
Sunday, June 26, 2011
Is a Million-Dollar March on Washington Coming Soon?
The Guardian today led today with the headline, "Wall Street and Republican lawmakers thwart U.S. financial reforms." Of the 380 rules supposed to be implemented at the end of the month, only 30 will be in effect. U.S. financial service firms have launched extremely strong efforts to halt, or slow down implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act. The corporation have launched the campaign despite lack of public support and the prior success of European regulators in implementing reforms more sweeping than those proposed in the U.S.
The changes mandated by Dodd-Frank will significantly change many markets. Implementation will impose price controls, require significant increased in staffing, and restrict compensation programs, to name a few. However, how far can U.S. regulators deviate from established international regulatory reforms? Can the U.S. really ignore EU regulatory risk frameworks without setting the stage for additional problems in the future? My bet is we have much less latitude than we all think.
The changes mandated by Dodd-Frank will significantly change many markets. Implementation will impose price controls, require significant increased in staffing, and restrict compensation programs, to name a few. However, how far can U.S. regulators deviate from established international regulatory reforms? Can the U.S. really ignore EU regulatory risk frameworks without setting the stage for additional problems in the future? My bet is we have much less latitude than we all think.
Friday, June 24, 2011
SEC Moves 3,200 RIAs to State Supervision
The Life & Health National Underwriter reported today that per Dodd-Frank requirements, the SEC is moving supervisory responsibilities to the states for RIAs with more than $25 M but less than $100 M in AUM. Over 3,200 RIAs will now be monitored by different agencies and different personnel. A change in supervision always raises a lot of interesting questions.
- Will the states have the staff to conduct the additional exams?
- Will some of the new emerging private compliance firms fill the demand?
- Will the exams by a "fresh set of eyes" flag new problems for small, regional firms?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
